Reference guide · EU Bathing Water Directive

How bathing water is classified: the EU thresholds explained

Every EU bathing water gets one of four classes — Excellent, Good, Sufficient or Poor — by comparing percentile values of two faecal-indicator bacteria, Escherichia coli and intestinal enterococci, with fixed limits in Annex I of Directive 2006/7/EC. Coastal and inland waters have different limits.

The limits behind each class

Values are colony-forming units (cfu) per 100 ml. “95th” and “90th” mean the percentile of the sampling results that must not exceed the limit.

Coastal and transitional waters (sea, lagoons, estuaries)
IndicatorExcellentGoodSufficient
Intestinal enterococci100 (95th)200 (95th)185 (90th)
E. coli250 (95th)500 (95th)500 (90th)
Inland waters (lakes and rivers)
IndicatorExcellentGoodSufficient
Intestinal enterococci200 (95th)400 (95th)330 (90th)
E. coli500 (95th)1,000 (95th)900 (90th)

A site is Poor when it fails the Sufficient limits. The Sufficient class uses the more lenient 90th percentile, which is why its enterococci limit can look lower than the Good limit: it is applied to a different point of the distribution.

How the assessment works

What each class means in practice

Sufficient is the legal minimum
EU countries must ensure bathing waters are at least Sufficient and take measures to raise the number of Excellent and Good sites.
Poor triggers management measures
For a Poor site the authority must take measures, including a bathing prohibition or advice against bathing, inform the public and work on the causes of pollution. After five consecutive Poor classifications, a permanent bathing prohibition or permanent advice against bathing is required.
Not classified is not a verdict
It usually means there were not enough valid samples, or the site is new or has changed. Of the 617 sites without a 2025 class in the EEA data, 286 had a classified season at some point since 2015.

What the 2025 data look like

Applying these rules, the EEA 2025 dataset contains 22,289 bathing waters. Coastal and transitional sites reach Excellent more often than lakes and rivers, which receive more run-off from farmland and towns and have less dilution.

GroupSitesExcellentGoodSufficientPoorNot classified
Coastal and transitional14,86187.4%7.7%2%1.1%1.7%
Inland (lakes, rivers)7,42878.3%11.3%2.9%2.7%4.8%
All bathing waters22,28984.4%8.9%2.3%1.6%2.8%

61 sites were classified Poor in each of the five seasons 2021–2025 — the situation in which the Directive requires a permanent prohibition or advice against bathing: POGRADEC (Albania), POGRADEC (Albania), DURRES (Albania), VLORE (Albania), POGRADEC (Albania), DURRES (Albania), VLORE (Albania), RAEKÜLA RAND (Estonia) and 53 more.

What the classes do not measure

The classification covers microbiological contamination only. It says nothing about cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) blooms, jellyfish, currents, water temperature, litter or chemical pollution, which authorities monitor and announce separately. That is why every site page here links to the national authority, and why an Excellent class is long-term context rather than today’s permission to swim.

Sources

All guides · Our methodology · Destinations · Rankings